Download Adobe Reader PDF    Resize font:

By I. Snorre. Johnson State College.

Zone of inhibition of more than 2mm from the edge of the disc generic 500 mg metformin with mastercard, were recorded ‘sensitive’ buy metformin 500 mg low cost. An extract of Butea frondosa had no antibacterial activity on the 12 tested organisms. Screening of some indigenous plants for anthelminthic action against Ascaris suum. Thirty three indigenous plants, traditionally claimed to be useful for purging human intestinal round worms and yet not been scientifically tested, were evaluated experimentally for their anthelminthic actions on an in vitro test Ascaris suum. Plant extracts were screened generally by a modification of the method of Sen and Hawkins (1960), and specific testing was done by the method of Goodwin (1958) as modified by Thawka-Kyin (1976). On the basis of producing muscle paralysis of the worm within predetermined experimental periods, twenty two of the plants tested were found to possess a moderate degree of anthelminthic activity and three of the plants, were highly potent ; the latters were Urginea indica, Ananas sativa and Hydnum sp. Screening of some medicinal plants reputed for anthelminthic activity on in vitro test models. Thirty three medicinal plants, traditionally claimed to be useful for purging human intestinal roundworms were evaluated experimentally for their anthelminthic action against Ascaris suum in vitro. On the basis of producing muscle paralysis of the worm within predetermined experimental periods, seventeen of the plants tested were found to possess anthelminthic activity. Urginea indica and Ananas sativa were most effective and a fungus, Hydnum repanda also showed good activity. Two indigenous medicinal plants, *rkef;wdrf-ym and ydef;&kdif; both of which have not yet been botanically identified were screened for their viper venom neutralization activity. Water- saline soluble extracts of both the plants showed no inhibitory activity on snake venom toxicity. Screening of the anti-peptic ulcer activity of some Myanmar traditional drugs experimentally. A further test model of gastric juice acidity in rats, employing pyloric ligation method, confirmed these three drugs reduced gastric acidity, particularly in diminishing the free acid amount to one-third and concomitantly attaining the pH of the gastric content to the value of 6-7. Standardization, pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of traditional drugs and herbal medicine: Project findings and recommendations. It describes the ingredients of each formulation with the retrospective weights, along with taste, dosage and indications. The ingredients of traditional drugs are mainly medicinal plants, while a few are materials of animal origin, mineral/inorganic salts or organic substances. The findings and recommendation consists of outputs, objectives achieved and conclusions. Structural and anti-hepatitis B viral activity study of some organic compounds present in the leaves of Urena lobata Linn. By percolation and silica gel column chromatographic separation methods, tiliroside, (3-O-β-D (6"-O- coumaryl) – glycopyranoside) (I) (0. However, the ethanolic extracts of Ywet-kya-pin-bauk leaves were more effective than those of Kat-si-ne leaves extracts. Structural elucidation of potent anti-bacterial constituents from Oroxylum indicum L. By silica gel column chromatographic separation, five compounds namely, oxoylin-A (A) (0. In vitro screening of antifungal activity using agar well diffusion method revealed all extracts (pet-ether, ethanol, methanol and ethyl acetate extracts) except aqueous extract were able to inhibit the growth of Candida albican. The investigation was conducted via diarrhoeal test, enteropolling test and gastrointestinal transit test. Results revealed that 6g/kg dose provided significant frequencies of diarrhoeal reducing effect, anti-secretory effect and anti-motility effect. However, ethyl acetate extract more rapidly discharged the purple background when compared to that of pet-ether extract showing much higher anti-oxidant potency. Chromatographic separation of active ethyl acetate extracts yielded three curcuminoids, namely curcumin (5. Isolated curcumin, thymoquinone, kaempferol, quercetin and the beter-diketone were found to show bactericidal activity. These plant extracts were tested for antibacterial activity on 18 bacterial organisms. The test organisms include five species of Shigella, three species of Vibrio and one species of each of Klebsiella, Plesiomonas, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Staphylococcus. It was investigated that the plant of Phyllanthus niruri with ethanolic, 50% ethanolic and watery extracts were active on one strain of Sr. The percentage activity of the three extracts and the number of bacteria tested were 7. It was found that the watery extract of Phyllantus niruri possessed the highest antibacterial activity. The three different extracts of Piper nigrum seed had no activity on the tested bacteria. The ethanolic, 50% ethanolic and watery extract of Terminalia chebula fruit was active on three strains (23. This research deals with the study on the morphological characters of the plant and anatomical characteristies of the leaf, the stem, the barks and the root.

discount metformin 500mg line

buy cheap metformin 500mg line

Finally generic metformin 500 mg otc, it is assumed that this primary care physician would have no ties at all to that clinical research discount metformin 500 mg with mastercard, which might otherwise potentially compromise his/her ability to protect the best interests of the patient for whom they are caring. Case of Donald: Gene Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis There are a number of other ethical issues that might be raised in connection with the case of David, but we will pass over them. The case of David is not about gene therapy, but it is actually an excellent model for the sorts of clinical ethical issues that are most likely to arise. Having discussed the case of David in some depth, this portion of our discussion can be much more concise. We start by recalling an earlier observation, namely, that patients enrolled in clinical trials for serious medical disorders are often in medically desperate circumstances; they have generally exhausted all other reasonable options. But this was not true with David; and it will generally not be true for many of the early trials with different approaches to gene therapy. As in the case of David, we will assume that Donald is very bright, which is to say he is capable of rationally processing the relevant medical information. Before commenting directly on this hypothetical case, we will lay out a common ethical framework often used to address cases like this, including a sharper arti- culation of some of the ethical issues raised by this case. That prompts the ethical question: Is Donald capable of making an autonomous choice in this matter? Would we (societal representatives) have the moral right to deny all 12-year-old individuals such an option, no matter how bright or mature they were, much as we deny the right to legally consume alcohol to those below age 21? A second basic principle of health care ethics, probably the oldest of these prin- ciples, is what is referred to as the principle of nonmaleficence. It is often interpreted to mean that at the very least physicians should do nothing that will cause unnec- essary harm to their patients. Surgeons will cause considerable misery to their patients because of what surgery is, but such surgery does not represent a net harm to the patient because it is confidently believed that surgery will restore the patient’s health. Further, the patient has freely agreed to the surgery because he sees this as protecting his best medical interests. So surgery in these circumstances does not rep- resent a violation of this ethical principle. These are not inert substances; they are often modified viruses, which is to suggest that there is some risk of biological modifica- tion of those viruses within an individual that could have serious adverse conse- quences. Again, we have David’s actual story as a reminder of the kind of risks that are associated with clinical medicine. It is expected that they will either be destroyed or that they will function in such a way that they produce the proteins with which they are normally associated. Again, it is not expected that these genes will somehow insert themselves into normal cells and disrupt the normal function- ing of the genetic machinery. We think we know enough about how things work at that level that it is extremely unlikely that something like that would happen. For any sort of major surgery patients are assuming significant enough risk of harm. We know in general the risks of anesthesia; and we know in general the risks of infection after surgery. In cases where that surgery is medically necessary (90% occluded coronary arteries), the risk of harm is ethically justified by the confidently expected medical benefit. In the case of Donald, however, we cannot talk about “confidently expected medical benefit. Further, there is some legitimate concern about unknown risks that could be very serious, again a reason why we describe these interventions as experimental. Facts like that would seem to undermine the ethical warrant for exposing this patient to almost any level of experimental risk. However, that should be taken as nothing more than a tentative conclusion at this point. There is a third ethical principle that needs to be considered at this point, what is usually referred to as the principle of beneficence. One formulation of this prin- ciple would say that physicians always ought to act in such a way as to advance the best medical interests of their patients. We saw in our discussion of the David case how this principle might be violated by allowing third-party interests, or the physi- cian’s own self-interests, to compromise inappropriately the patient’s interests. It is a common practice today to pay physicians a fee for “recruiting” patients for clinical trials. The fee is intended to cover the cost of that physician’s time in discussing with a patient the nature of the trial and why he might wish to consider it. It is reasonable to ask whether there is anything ethically suspect about this practice. If, on the other hand, the fee is very generous, and it is really intended as a strong incentive for that physician to persuade patients to participate in these trials, then it is prima facie ethically suspect. If he were reluctant to do so, that suggests the practice is potentially ethically corruptive. Sound ethical judgments are always capable of standing the light of day, that is, public scrutiny. There are at least two other construals of that principle that need to be considered in relation to the case of Donald.

buy metformin 500mg on line

discount metformin 500 mg

Once the dogs went through this first part of the experiment purchase 500 mg metformin, they were placed in a “shuttle box discount 500mg metformin otc,” a box separated in the middle by a small barrier that the dogs could jump over. The dogs would be electrically shocked but could escape the shock by simply jumping over the barrier to the other side. Seligman hypothesized that the first and third groups would quickly figure this out but that the second group of dogs would have learned to be helpless in that they would believe nothing they could do mattered. Seligman thought that the dogs in the second group would simply lie down and accept the shock. As predicted, the first and third groups of dogs learned within seconds that they could avoid the shock by jumping over the barrier, while the dogs in the second group would simply lie down and not even make an effort to jump over the barrier, though they could see the other side of the shuttle box. Seligman and his colleagues went on to show that many humans react in a fashion identical to that of animals in these experiments. The adoption of Seligman’s model was revolutionary in psychopharmacology, as it became an effective experiment to test antidepressant drugs. Basically, when animals that had learned to be helpless were given antidepressants, they would unlearn helplessness and start exerting control over their environment. Researchers discovered that when animals learned to be helpless, this resulted in alteration of brain monoamine content. Researchers also discovered that when animals with learned helplessness were taught how to gain control over their environment, their brain chemistry also normalized. The alteration in brain monoamine content in the animals with learned helplessness mirrors the altered monoamine content in human depression. Although most physicians look quickly to drugs to alter brain chemistry, helping patients to gain greater control over their lives actually produces even greater biochemical changes. One of the most powerful techniques to produce the necessary biochemical changes in the brains of depressed individuals is to teach them to be more optimistic. Outside the laboratory setting, Seligman discovered that the determining factor in how a person would react to uncontrollable events, either “bad” or “good,” was his or her explanatory style—the way in which the person explained events. However, individuals who were pessimistic were extremely likely to become depressed when something went wrong in their lives. Seligman and other researchers also found a direct correlation between an individual’s level of optimism and the likeliness of developing not only clinical depression but other illnesses as well. Optimists rarely got depressed, but pessimists were extremely likely to battle depression and other psychological disturbances. Serotonin has been referred to as the brain’s own mood- elevating and tranquilizing drug. Because the manufacture of serotonin in the brain is dependent upon how much tryptophan is delivered to the brain, in experimental studies researchers can feed human volunteers or animals diets lacking tryptophan and note the effects of such a diet. The results from these sorts of studies have contributed greatly in our understanding on just how vital proper levels of serotonin are to a positive human experience. For example, low levels of serotonin are linked to depression, with the lowest levels being observed in people who have committed or attempted suicide. Most of the commonly used antidepressant drugs work primarily by increasing the effects of serotonin. Once serotonin is manufactured in the brain it is stored in nerve cells waiting for release. Upon release, the serotonin carries a chemical message by binding to receptor sites on the neighboring nerve cell. Almost as soon as the serotonin is released enzymes are at work that will either break down the serotonin or work to uptake the serotonin back into the brain cells. It is at this point that various drugs typically work to either inhibit the reuptake of serotonin or prevent its breakdown. Because serotonin reuptake is inhibited, there is more serotonin hanging around, capable of binding to receptor sites. The effectiveness of antidepressant drugs has been the subject of several reviews. The results indicate that they have not been shown to work any better than a placebo in cases of mild to moderate depression, the most common reason for prescription medication, and claims that antidepressants are more effective in more severe conditions have little evidence to support them. As one group of researcher concluded, “Given doubt about their benefits and concern about their risks, current recommendations for prescribing antidepressants should be reconsidered. While antidepressant drugs are only marginally successful at best in alleviating depression, they do produce many side effects. Approximately 20% of patients experience nausea, 20% headaches, 15% anxiety and nervousness, 14% insomnia, 12% drowsiness, 12% diarrhea, 9. There is also a significant risk for weight gain and the development of type 2 diabetes (see the box below). Statistics show that once weight gain begins in a patient taking these medications it usually does not stop. These drugs induce weight gain because they alter an area of the brain that regulates both serotonin levels and the utilization of glucose.

8 of 10 - Review by I. Snorre
Votes: 97 votes
Total customer reviews: 97
Proud partner of: